Author(s)

Shyamal Baskey

  • Manuscript ID: 140828
  • Volume: 2
  • Issue: 7
  • Pages: 578–595

Subject Area: Arts and Humanities

Abstract

This research paper undertakes a rigorous and systematic examination of the ethical philosophy of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), widely regarded as one of the most influential moral philosophers in the history of Western thought. Kant's deontological ethics, grounded in the faculty of pure practical reason, represents a watershed moment in the development of normative moral theory. The paper explores the foundational pillars of Kantian ethics: the concept of the Good Will as the only unconditionally good thing, the Categorical Imperative in its three principal formulations—the Formula of Universal Law, the Formula of Humanity, and the Formula of the Kingdom of Ends—and the doctrine of autonomy as the basis of moral dignity. Through comprehensive conceptual analysis, critical literature review, and comparative philosophical inquiry, this study investigates the internal coherence, practical applicability, and enduring relevance of Kant's moral framework. The methodology employed is qualitative and analytical, drawing on primary Kantian texts and secondary scholarly literature spanning over two centuries. A structured literature review matrix synthesizes contributions from seminal thinkers including Korsgaard, O'Neill, Wood, Rawls, Williams, and others. The study addresses the central problem of whether a purely reason-based ethics, divorced from empirical inclination and consequence, can provide a sufficient and adequate guide to human moral conduct. The findings affirm the remarkable durability of Kantian ethics while acknowledging significant philosophical challenges including the problem of moral rigorism, conflicts between duties, and the tension between universal principles and contextual judgment.
The paper concludes that Kantian ethics, though requiring thoughtful refinement and contextual application, remains indispensable to contemporary moral philosophy, bioethics, political theory, and global human rights discourse.

Keywords